What was resolution 660




















The PDF of this page is being created. The Security Council, Reaffirming its resolution of August 2, , Deeply concerned that that resolution has not been implemented and that the invasion by Iraq of Kuwait continues with further loss of human life and material destruction, [ Or is obedience first owed to UN Security Council decisions? Does an armed conflict even exist in this case to such an extent that IHL applies? Which are the parties to the conflict? Is the UN a party to the conflict?

Does international law regulate the imposition of sanctions? Assuming that IHL applies, does it limit the use of sanctions? GC IV, Art. Is your reply the same if, as a result of the long-term imposition, the sanctions financially weaken the State so much that it cannot provide for the food and medical needs of its people? Should not an attempt be made to first interpret Security Council resolutions in a manner consistent with IHL?

Home About Contact. Resolution number Search. Persian Gulf War. Resolution Conflict timeline Disarmament timeline. Cancel Save. Universal Conquest Wiki. Skip to main content. November 23, Iraq's well-publicized refusal to allow Americans to participate in on-site inspections of Iraq's chemical, biological and missile capabilities led the United Nations Security Council on November 12 to adopt Resolution Acting under its enforcement authority in Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the Council condemned Iraq for its continued violations of its obligations, under the relevant Security Council resolutions, to cooperate fully with the UN Special Commission appointed pursuant to Resolution to carry out the on-site inspections, and imposed mandatory travel restrictions on Iraqi officials and armed forces members who were responsible for the violations or participated in them.

Resolution also expressed "the firm intention to take further measures as may be required for the implementation of this resolution. The United States government has said that Iraq must comply or face the consequences, including possible use of the military option. The United States and the United Kingdom have asserted that they already have adequate authority from the Security Council to use the military option.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000